Chapter 5 of my book was authored by Robert Probst and was titled: Tom Sawyer, Teaching, and Talking. In the chapter, Probst asserts that many students who are in are classrooms to learn, are often passive learners. Yes, many will do the work in order to get the grade, or move up to an advanced placement class, or even to make their parents happy, but often those learners are just jumping through the hoops for that extrinsic reward, not because they enjoy or are excited about what we are teaching.
Sound familiar?
Unfortunately, some of the scenarios Probst described did sound familiar. He addresses the problem, and points out that many times, through the work we assign, we are adding to this problem, as much of the work asks students to focus on "...recitation, rather than authentic discussion, as the common mode of discourse in most classrooms (pp. 46)."
Part of the problem is that we are doing too much of the work for the students! What? Teachers do too much, sounds crazy, right? If our final goal is to have students become life-long readers, Probst asserts that we must teach them to have authentic discussions about literature, and to give them more ownership of those discussions, rather than always guiding them through our own questions and ideas. Hence, the Tom Sawyer reference, have students do more of the work than we are doing.
Obviously this idea takes some, well for lack of a better word, training. We should serve as facilitators to guide students to, first of all, create authentic questions, and then use those questions to guide discussions in small groups and whole class discussions. If you are like me, my first reaction was to doubt that my students would be capable of producing those thought stimulating questions that I have been "trained" to do through my years of schooling and experience. However, Probst provides some ideas that seem surprisingly easy and manageable to help students get to the point where they are producing thought stimulating questions over literature.
One idea is to initially have students share their questions out loud and write versions of them on the board (I envision kind of guiding the questions, possibly adding to or altering them if needed, but maybe that's me being too in control, I'm not sure). The class would then be broken into groups to analyze and answer the question before sharing with the whole class. Another idea is to have students create questions, then put them in groups to present and discuss questions. The third option is to collect questions students have created, then sort the questions into stacks. These stacks will then determine the groups, and again students will meet and discuss.
I decided to use a version of these ideas in my class today. As we read a chapter in our novel, students recorded two questions on an index card, one on each side. I then had students walk around the room until I felt they were "mixed" well. I then had students stop and talk to a person who was close by. Each student shared one of the two questions from their card and they discussed. We then mixed again, and students shared the other question with a different classmate. As it was our first time doing this, I was very pleased with some of the questions students created and the discussions which were held. I'm excited to have students take even more ownership in their discussions!
I agree that I tend to do too much guiding and not enough facilitating. I always get stuck, some of my groups are not as vocal as others, and I find myself doing all of the talking. I liked your strategy and would interested to know how the discussions went. Did you place yourself in some of the groups to hear what the students were saying? Or could you tell that the discussion was going in the direction you would like.
ReplyDeleteHaving students create and then answer their own questions sounds like such a simple idea and yet it is rarely done in the classroom. Maybe it is because we, teachers, don't have enough confidence in our students; maybe it is because we like to be in control of what is going on in the classroom; or maybe it does not follow the curriculum.
ReplyDeleteI remember one of my middle school math teachers used to have us create small quizzes for one another and do the grading afterwards. I enjoyed that and learned a great deal from the process.
The way Probst describes students does sound familiar because I was one of those students growing up. I just did what I was told to get a good grade rarely because I was excited about what I was learning. I didn't enjoy learning until college really were I was able to discuss my own questions and comments without fear of being wrong. I like that idea. I also think its really cool that you already trying out these strategies in your own classroom.
ReplyDeleteI think it is so natural to guide rather than facilitate because when we read something interesting, the natural response is to talk about it. I definitely find myself doing this and I need to reel it back because I've found that my students will write about what I say rather than their own ideas. It sounds like your book has some good strategies on how to ask questions and have students develop their own opinions rather than lecturing. I feel like after going through so much schooling, I am able to develop meaningful insights into books, but I'm not at a book club with my peers, I'm in a classroom trying to help students through the same kind of skill building I had. I think it is pretty tough to keep this in mind, but when I do remember and students give me their own thoughts in papers, I am so pleased to see that a lot of them see things that I didn't even notice.
ReplyDelete